Lib Dems brand UK Biometrics “Worse than thieves”
Monday, February 19th, 2007Despite praise from OFSTED, describing UK Biometrics’ fingerprint entry systems as “protecting children from harm”, combined with their triumph in scooping the “most innovative product” award at 2006 NMT awards, Sarah Teather thinks UK biometrics and similar firms are worse than thieves. Probably not quite as bad as the people they protect our kids from, eh Sarah?
Speaking to the Sunday Express on the recent installation at Snapdragons Nursery in Bath of a biometric ‘fingerprint recognition’ door access system, Liberal Democrat Shadow Education Secretary Sarah Teather MP claimed biometric system developers were “Worse than thieves” since someone could close a bank account if their PIN was stolen, whereas biometric systems took a child’s identity for life.
Matthew James, UK Biometrics Managing Director and supplier of the biometric access system installed at Snapdragons Nursery said: “I would have thought a Shadow Minister would check her facts before branding a responsible industry as worse then identity thieves. The biometric access system installed at Snapdragons Nursery in Bath does not scan children’s fingerprints; it registers parents and staff to allow secure door access. Our biometric access systems protect children and staff throughout the UK. Biometric access is welcomed by teachers, parents and education professionals. Sarah Teather is not a teacher or a parent and she clearly does not understand the science”.
Matthew James continued: “Biometrics is the only access system that cannot be lost, stolen, copied or hacked. Once installed teachers and carers can focus on childcare secure in the knowledge that unauthorised persons cannot gain access to the building. By casting unfounded aspersions on the biometrics industry Sarah Teather is guilty of engaging in sound bite politics and is spreading alarmist claptrap among parents”.
For more pearls of wisdom like this, vote for the Liberal Democrats.
